ReviewBiosensors2025
Organic Bioelectronics in Microphysiological Systems: Bridging the Gap Between Biological Systems and Electronic Technologies.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Organoids to Unlock the Potential of Human Torpor for Spaceflight.Current stem cell reports · 2026Article
- Combined Use of Microwave Sensing Technologies and Artificial Intelligence for Biomedical Monitoring and Imaging.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Hydrogel-Based Monitoring in Perioperative Anesthesia: A Conceptual Review and Translational Perspective.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing burden of degenerative, cardiovascular, neurodegenerative, and cancerous diseases necessitates innovative approaches to improve our pathophysiological understanding and ability to modulate biological processes. Organic bioelectronics has emerged as a powerful tool in this pursuit, offering a unique ability to interact with biology due to the mixed ionic-electronic conduction and tissue-mimetic mechanical properties of conducting polymers (CPs). These materials enable seamless integration with biological systems across different levels of complexity, from monolayers to complex 3D models, microfluidic chips, and even clinical applications. CPs can be processed into diverse formats, including thin films, hydrogels, 3D scaffolds, and electrospun fibers, allowing the fabrication of advanced bioelectronic devices such as multi-electrode arrays, transistors (EGOFETs, OECTs), ion pumps, and photoactuators. This review examines the integration of CP-based bioelectronics in vivo and in in vitro microphysiological systems, focusing on their ability to monitor key biological events, including electrical activity, metabolic changes, and biomarker concentrations, as well as their potential for electrical, mechanical, and chemical stimulation. We highlight the versatility and biocompatibility of CPs and their role in advancing personalized medicine and regenerative therapies and discuss future directions for organic bioelectronics to bridge the gap between biological systems and electronic technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.