ArticleBiosensors2025
Pattern Recognition of Neurotransmitters: Complexity Reduction for Serotonin and Dopamine.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we simultaneously detected and predicted the concentration levels of serotonin (SE) and dopamine (DA) neurotransmitters (NTs) for in vitro mixtures, with measurements obtained using conventional glassy carbon electrodes (CGCEs) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). The NTs were estimated by deconvolving the multiplexed signals of both NTs using Principal Component Analysis with Gaussian Process Regression (PCA-GPR) and Partial Least Squares with Gaussian Process Regression (PLS-GPR), both with exponential-isotropic kernels. The average testing accuracies of estimation using PCA-GPR for DA alone, SE alone and their mixture (DA-SE) were 87.6%, 88.1%, and 96.7%, respectively. Using PLS-GPR, the testing accuracies of estimation for DA alone, SE alone, and their mixture (DA-SE) were 87.3%, 83.8%, and 95.1%, respectively. Furthermore, we explored methods of reducing the procedural complexity in estimating the NTs by finding reduced subsets of features for accurately detecting and predicting their concentrations. The reduced subsets of features found in the oxidation potential windows of the NTs improved the testing accuracy of the estimation of DA-SE to 97.4%. We thus believe that reducing complexity has the potential to increase the detection and prediction accuracies of NT measurements for practical clinical uses such as deep brain stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.