ReviewBiosensors2025
Modern Emerging Biosensing Methodologies for the Early Diagnosis and Screening of Ovarian Cancer.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Ovarian Tumor Biomarkers: Correlation Between Tumor Type and Marker Expression, and Their Role in Guiding Therapeutic Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- 3Oncology research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is one of the leading causes of gynecological cancer-related death worldwide. Late diagnosis at advanced stages of OC is the reason for a higher mortality rate. Earlier diagnosis and proper treatment are important for improving the prognosis of OC patients. Biosensors offer accurate, low-cost, rapid, and user-friendly devices that can be employed for the detection of OC-specific biomarkers in the early stage. Therefore, it is important to consider the potential biomarkers in the biological fluids to confirm the OC prognosis. Out of many biomarkers, the most commonly tested clinically is cancer antigen 125 (CA-125). However, CA-125 is considered to be a poor biomarker for OC diagnosis. Several biosensing methods were developed for the sensitive and quantitative detection of each biomarker. In abnormal expression in OC patients, nucleic acids, enzymes, cells, and exosomes are used as target biomarkers for the construction of biosensors. This review focuses on the development for the detection of various biomarkers using multiple biosensing methods. Here, we describe the origin and the significance of OC-associated biomarkers, the working principle of biosensors, and the classification of biosensors based on their recognition elements and signal transducers. The modes of detection and sensitivity of the sensors are discussed. Finally, the challenges in the fabrication, obstacles in the clinical application, and future prospects are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.