ReviewDentistry journal2025
Biomaterials for Guided Tissue Regeneration and Guided Bone Regeneration: A Review.
Review in Dentistry journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydration-Dependent Thermal and Microstructural Characterization of a Collagen-Based 3D Matrix for Periodontal Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Article
- Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Customized Titanium Occlusive Barriers with Window Modification for Guided Bone Regeneration: Radiographic and Histological Outcomes.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Local Delivery of Genistein in Peri-Implant Defects Enhances Osseointegration in Ovariectomized Rats.Calcified tissue international · 2026Article
- Histological and clinical evaluation of novel deproteinized porcine bone mineral in socket preservation: a case report.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Membrane-free bone regeneration using biphasic calcium phosphate, heterologous fibrin biopolymer, and photobiomodulation: anThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Bioactive Glass Modified by Sonochemistry Improves Peri-Implant Bone Repair in Ovariectomized Rats.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Sinus Lift with Collagenated Porcine Xenograft in Severely Atrophic Posterior Maxillae: Case Series with Histologic Correlation and Long-Term Outcomes.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Rat Calvarial Guided Bone Regeneration Model: Preclinical Insights into Biomaterials, Barrier Design, and Systemic Modulators.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- In Vitro Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Resorbable Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- A Critical Review of Commercial Collagen-Based Scaffolds in Bone Regeneration: Functional Properties and Clinical Evidence from InfuseJournal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Biofunctional response of a synthetic ceramic of 99.9% tricalcium phosphate associated with a heterologous fibrin biopolymer and infrared photobiomodulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Application and mechanism study of EMD-Gel composite scaffold in dental pulp tissue repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aims to provide an overview of the types of membranes, bone substitutes, and mucosal substitutes used for GTR and GBR and briefly explores recent innovations for tissue regeneration and their future perspectives. Since this is a narrative review, no systematic search, meta-analysis, or statistical analysis was conducted. Using biomaterials for GTR and GBR provides a reduction in postoperative morbidity, as it contributes to less invasive clinical procedures, serving as an alternative to autogenous grafts. Moreover, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews are essential for the evaluation of new biomaterials. These studies provide more robust evidence and help guide clinical practice in the selection of safer and more effective biomaterials, allowing for the personalization of treatment protocols for each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.