ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2025
CrAssphage distribution analysis in an Amazonian river based on metagenomic sequencing data and georeferencing.
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regulatory Harmonization Needs for Farm-to-Fork Bacteriophage Applications in South American Food Systems.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viruses are the most abundant biological entities in all ecosystems of the world. Their ubiquity makes them suitable candidates for indicating fecal contamination in rivers. Recently, a group of Bacteroidetes bacteriophages named CrAssphages, which are highly abundant, sensitive, and specific to human feces, were studied as potential viral biomarkers for human fecal pollution in water bodies. In this study, we evaluated the presence, diversity, and abundance of viruses with a focus on crAssphages via metagenomic analysis in an Amazonian river and conducted correlation analyses on the basis of physicochemical and georeferencing data. Several significant differences in viral alpha diversity indexes were observed among the sample points, suggesting an accumulation of viral organisms in the river mouth, whereas beta diversity analysis revealed a significant divergence between replicates of the most downstream point (IT4) when compared to the rest of the samples, possibly due to increased human impact at this point. In terms of the presence of crAssphage, the analysis identified 61 crAssphage contigs distributed along the Itacaiúnas River. Moreover, our analysis revealed significant correlations between 19 crAssphage contigs and human population density, substantiating the use of these viruses as possible markers for human fecal pollution in the Itacaiúnas River. This study is the first to assess the presence of crAssphages in an Amazonian river, with results suggesting the potential use of these viruses as markers for human fecal pollution in the Amazon. IMPORTANCE: The Amazon biome is one of the most diverse ecosystems in the world and contains the most vast river network; however, the continuous advance of urban centers toward aquatic bodies exacerbates the discharge of pollutants into these water bodies. Fecal contamination contributes significantly to water pollution, and the application of an improved fecal indicator is essential for evaluating water quality. In this study, we evaluated the presence, diversity, and abundance of crAssphages in an Amazonian river and performed correlation analysis on the basis of physicochemical and georeferencing data to test whether crAssphages are viable fecal pollution markers. Our analysis revealed both the presence of crAssphages and their correlation with physicochemical data and showed significant correlations between the relative abundance of crAssphages and human density. These results suggest the potential use of these viruses as markers for water quality assessment in Amazonian rivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.