Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40277327›Full record

ArticleJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2025

Psychosocial distress and persistent adverse events in long-term survivors of stage IV melanoma - a cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Markus Reitmajer, Norbert Schäffeler, Anne Bach, Lena Nanz, Teresa Amaral, Ulrike Leiter, Lukas Flatz, Andrea Forschner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cancer survivorship in malignant melanoma.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Psychosocial distress and persistent adverse events in long-term survivors of stage IV melanoma - a cross-sectional questionnaire study.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Markus ReitmajerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7134-1043
Norbert SchäffelerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Anne BachDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Lena NanzDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Teresa AmaralDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ulrike LeiterDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8019-1577
Lukas FlatzDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Andrea ForschnerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6185-4945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies have improved survival in patients with stage IV melanoma. However, the challenges faced by long-term survivors remain unclear. The long-term toxicity and psychosocial impact of these treatments in real-world patients have yet to be reported. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study using established screening tools, including the Hornheide Screening Instrument (HSI), the Distress Thermometer (DT) with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) problem list, and melanoma-specific questions addressing persistent adverse events, social impairments, emotional needs, and financial concerns.

resultsA total of 159 patients with stage IV melanoma (≥5 years after the initial diagnosis) were enrolled, of whom 93 completed the questionnaire. Approximately one-third of DT/HSI values exceeded the threshold, indicating a need for psycho-oncological support. More than 40% of patients reported persistent treatment-related complaints. Financial and work-related impacts were rare, affecting approximately 8% and 1% of patients, respectively.

conclusionsHigh rates of psychosocial distress and persistent adverse events were observed, highlighting the need for cancer survivorship programs in the follow-up care of melanoma patients.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMelanomaPsychological DistressSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingSurveys and QuestionnairesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorscancer survivorslong‐term survivorsMelanoma stage IVpsychosocial burdenquality of lifesurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID40277327
PMCPMC12257058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.