ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025
Worldwide barriers of optimal surgical care provision in advanced ovarian cancer.
Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Hidden Cost of Delay: Post-Pandemic Evolution of Advanced Ovarian Cancer Profiles.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Article
- Worldwide barriers of optimal surgical care provision in advanced ovarian cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Review
- FIGO Cancer Report 2025: Transforming gynecologic oncology through global equity, technological innovation, and preventive strategies.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) remains one of the most challenging gynecological malignancies to cure, despite recent advances in treatment. Disparities in the diagnosis, management, and survival of OC exist worldwide and addressing them remains an ongoing challenge. The highest burden of OC is projected to be in women living in low- and middle-income countries, where mortality rates are also disproportionately higher. Maximal effort cytoreduction paired with maximal effort systemic therapy followed by maintenance therapies remain the cornerstones of treatment for OC. Disparities are twofold: first, due to challenges with systemic therapy; and second, due to variations in surgical care, especially for advanced disease. While the goals of surgery remain unchanged, the radicality of cytoreductive resections and variation in practices worldwide have increased. The provision of surgical care for OC patients faces numerous challenges broadly categorized into three main areas: health system barriers; patient-related barriers; and physician-related barriers. Health system challenges include the lack of centralized cancer care, scarcity of resources, and inadequate funding. Patient-related obstacles include disparities in patient education, comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, and underrepresentation of certain ethnicities in clinical trials. Physician-related barriers encompass suboptimal surgical training, limited access to educational resources, inconsistent adherence to guidelines, limited use of a multidisciplinary team and overall differences in philosophy, ethos, and surgical tradition. Addressing and overcoming these barriers is essential to ensure equitable access to high-quality surgical care for OC patients worldwide. The aim of the present review was to further explore these global challenges while also highlighting potential strategies to reduce disparities in women's health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.