Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40277255›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Worldwide barriers of optimal surgical care provision in advanced ovarian cancer.

Shriya Varghese, Myong Cheol Lim, Robert Armbrust, Rene Pareja, Christina Fotopoulou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Worldwide barriers of optimal surgical care provision in advanced ovarian cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  4. FIGO Cancer Report 2025: Transforming gynecologic oncology through global equity, technological innovation, and preventive strategies.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shriya VargheseDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7776-9174
Myong Cheol LimCenter for Gynecologic Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8964-7158
Robert ArmbrustDepartment of Gynecology with Center for Oncological Surgery-Charité Berlin, European Competence Centre for Ovarian Cancer, Berlin, Germany.
Rene ParejaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Christina FotopoulouDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-9645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ovarian cancer (OC) remains one of the most challenging gynecological malignancies to cure, despite recent advances in treatment. Disparities in the diagnosis, management, and survival of OC exist worldwide and addressing them remains an ongoing challenge. The highest burden of OC is projected to be in women living in low- and middle-income countries, where mortality rates are also disproportionately higher. Maximal effort cytoreduction paired with maximal effort systemic therapy followed by maintenance therapies remain the cornerstones of treatment for OC. Disparities are twofold: first, due to challenges with systemic therapy; and second, due to variations in surgical care, especially for advanced disease. While the goals of surgery remain unchanged, the radicality of cytoreductive resections and variation in practices worldwide have increased. The provision of surgical care for OC patients faces numerous challenges broadly categorized into three main areas: health system barriers; patient-related barriers; and physician-related barriers. Health system challenges include the lack of centralized cancer care, scarcity of resources, and inadequate funding. Patient-related obstacles include disparities in patient education, comorbidities, socioeconomic factors, and underrepresentation of certain ethnicities in clinical trials. Physician-related barriers encompass suboptimal surgical training, limited access to educational resources, inconsistent adherence to guidelines, limited use of a multidisciplinary team and overall differences in philosophy, ethos, and surgical tradition. Addressing and overcoming these barriers is essential to ensure equitable access to high-quality surgical care for OC patients worldwide. The aim of the present review was to further explore these global challenges while also highlighting potential strategies to reduce disparities in women's health care.

Indexed as

Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleGlobal HealthHumansbarrierschallengesdisparitiesglobalovarian cancersurgery

Identifiers

PMID40277255
PMCPMC12411822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.