ArticleTransfusion2025
Machine learning-based prediction of bleeding risk in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients using transfusion as a surrogate marker.
Article in Transfusion, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in the identification and prediction of adverse transfusion reactions(ATRs) and implications for clinical management: a systematic review of models and applications.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Pooled it
- A Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Scoping Review Study.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-guided tools in adult ECMO: Current advancements, emerging Trends and future directions.Perfusion · 2026Review
- Alternate and Emerging Anticoagulation Strategies for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Development and internal validation of an interpretable machine learning model to predict coagulopathy following extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective multicenter study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of bleeding risk in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients using transfusion as a surrogate marker.Transfusion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has highlighted challenges in managing bleeding complications. Optimal transfusion strategies remain uncertain for this diverse patient group, necessitating accurate predictive tools. This study developed and validated a machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict bleeding complications in patients with ECMO, using red blood cell (RBC) transfusion as a surrogate marker.
methodsData from the Tokushukai Medical Database (2018-2022), covering 71 hospitals, were used. An ML approach was employed to predict bleeding complications, using RBC transfusion events as a surrogate marker. Model performance was evaluated using precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was conducted to identify key factors influencing model predictions.
resultsOut of 470 ECMO-treated intensive care unit patients, 357 were included for model development. Forty-seven variables were used, with the light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) and random forest models performing better than the other models, with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) above 0.7 for both (accuracy: 70.5%, ROC AUC: 0.703, recall: 0.784, and ROC AUC: 0.705, respectively). Models such as extreme gradient boosting performed similarly, while support vector classification had the lowest performance. SHAP analysis identified circulating blood volume, hemoglobin, and weight as the most important predictive factors. DISCUSSION: The LightGBM and Random Forest models effectively predict bleeding complications in patients with ECMO, using RBC transfusion as a surrogate marker. This tool can support early identification of high-risk patients and improve overall transfusion management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.