ArticleAnatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)2026
Comparative and functional anatomy of masticatory muscles and bite force in opossums (Didelphimorphia, Didelphidae).
Article in Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feeding biomechanics in vertebrates and beyond.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026Article
- Anatomical description of the jaw muscles and theoretical bite force assessment in South American opossums using manual and digital dissection methods.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Opossums (Didelphidae) are American marsupials traditionally known for their generalized morphology and generalist feeding habits. They include a diversity of similar items in their diets, but the proportion of types of items consumed varies between taxa. Thus, feeding ecology shows varying degrees of omnivory or food preference that cannot be distinguished into strict dietary categories. With few exceptions, the anatomical and functional relationship between the masticatory muscles and variation in food resources used in opossums is unknown. Here we provide comparative descriptions of the jaw adductor muscle anatomy and architecture of nine Didelphidae genera. The muscles were dissected, weighed, and chemically digested for separation and measurement of the muscle fascicles. We estimated the potential physiological cross-sectional area (pPCSA) of the muscles and used 2D lever arm mechanics to calculate the potential bite force on the canine and first molar. We tested the allometric relationships of muscle variables and bite forces and the correlation of bite forces with diet and diet mechanical challenge (relative frequency of hard items). The adductor muscles were represented by the m. temporalis and m. masseter, with two layers (superficial and deep) each, and m. pterygoideus medialis across the sample. The m. zygomaticomandibularis was also identified in most genera, except for Didelphis and Lutreolina. Muscle anatomy is conserved but varies in the extent of the attachment areas, in part due to differences in skull morphology. The anatomical diversification and relationships between muscles corresponded to a generalized pattern in most genera, which proved to be efficient for adding different items to the diet. The mass, average fascicle length, and pPCSA of the adductor muscles scaled isometrically with size. Bite forces on the canine and first molar also scaled isometrically and were not correlated with diet or diet mechanical challenge. Therefore, the variation in quantitative myological data and bite force was consistent with size, and the increase in bite force supports dietary diversification associated with increased size in opossums.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.