ArticleInternal medicine journal2025
Opportunistic screening for diabetes among urban Aboriginal adults during emergency department attendance.
Article in Internal medicine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAboriginal people have a high risk of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Routine opportunistic testing using glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for diabetes in the emergency department (ED) offers an opportunity to detect undiagnosed diabetes and evaluate glycaemia for pre-existing diabetes.
aimsTo evaluate the prevalence of pre-existing diabetes and assess random blood glucose (RBG) and HbA1c as screening tools for undiagnosed diabetes in Aboriginal people attending the ED.
methodsDemographic and RBG data were extracted for all Aboriginal adults presenting to a Sydney hospital ED over 6 months. Practitioners requested blood tests as per routine care, and in the final 3 months, HbA1c was automatically added to routine venous sampling. The primary outcome was change in diabetes diagnosis with the addition of HbA1c.
resultsOverall, 1640 adult Aboriginal patients presented to the ED over 6 months (4.1% of all presentations), including 734 unique individuals tested during routine care. The prevalence of pre-existing T2DM was 12.0% (n = 88). Among those without known diabetes, 1.4% (n = 9) had glucose readings ≥11.1 mmol/L and 14.3% (n = 90) had glucose readings 7.0-11.0 mmol/L. For those without known diabetes with HbA1c measurement, there were 2.7% (n = 8) with HbA1c ≥6.5% and 4% (n = 12) with HbA1c 6.0%-6.4%. There was no overlap between those who had an HbA1c ≥6.5% and RBG ≥11.1 mmol/L.
conclusionsThere was a high prevalence of pre-existing diabetes among Aboriginal adults attending the ED. New diabetes diagnosis in the ED based on RBG or HbA1c was not common. Confirmatory testing for diabetes should be recommended to the general practitioners of patients in whom elevated HbA1c or RBG are identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.