ReviewClinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology2025
Strategies to Develop Regenerative Medicine Approaches for Olfactory Disorders.
Review in Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Efficacy of Intranasal Insulin in the Treatment of Post-Viral Persistent Olfactory Dysfunction: A Systematic Review.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2026Review
- Dawn of a new era in olfactory regeneration: Pediatric stem cell therapy enters the era of long-term validation.World journal of stem cells · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Olfactory loss affects more than 12% of the population, with prevalence increasing in aging individuals. Multiple conditions can lead to a loss of smell (hyposmia or anosmia), including post-viral damage from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or influenza, head injuries, sinusitis, or neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer or Parkinson disease. Although treatments like surgery, anti-inflammatory medications, or olfactory training can be beneficial in certain cases, there remains an unmet need for effective therapies addressing many common causes of olfactory dysfunction. This is particularly true for cases attributed to damage of olfactory neurons that fail to spontaneously recover. Regenerative medicine approaches, aimed at either stimulating the regrowth of sensory neural structures or replacing them through cell-based therapies, have attracted considerable interest for treating various neurological disorders, including olfactory loss. Here, we summarize the intrinsic regenerative capabilities of the peripheral olfactory system, focusing on current research strategies and the existing barriers that must be overcome for successful translational applications. A major unmet need in this field involves the establishment of reliable and widely accepted culture models for expanding and differentiating olfactory stem or progenitor cells from rodents and humans, both for use in vitro assays and as potential material for cell-based therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.