Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276831›Full record

ReviewThe Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi2025

[Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Quality of Colonoscopy].

Ji Hyun Kim, Sung Chul Park, Hyun-Soo Kim

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ji Hyun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Sung Chul ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Hyun-Soo KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7190-0362

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and a major health concern in Korea. Although colonoscopy is an effective tool for screening and preventing colorectal cancer through the early detection of pre-cancerous lesions, many factors influence the quality of colonoscopy, including fatigue, experience, inter-observer variation, and human error. Minimizing errors and providing consistent performance improves the quality of colonoscopy, which can lower cancer-related mortality. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to the application of computer-aided detection (CADe) and computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) of neoplastic polyps, such as adenomas, and computer-aided quality assessment (CAQ), which involves monitoring withdrawal time, assessing cecal insertion, and ensuring sufficient colonic surface observation. Many AI models have been developed, and some CADe and CADx systems have become commercially available, demonstrating their usefulness in detection of adenomas and characterization of polyps. Additionally, clinical studies on the usefulness of CAQ have been published. This innovative technology holds great potential to assist endoscopists and benefit the general population. In the future, an evaluation of the practical benefits and cost-effectiveness of applying AI models to colonoscopy in clinical practice seems necessary.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceColonoscopyAdenomaColonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedEarly Detection of CancerHumansArtificial intelligenceCADeCADxCAQColonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40276831
PMCPMC12285288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.