Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276717›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Ziyi Wang, Weizhi Chen, Minghao Yang, Lamei Jiang, Ze Wang, Cai Ren, Xianhua Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ziyi Wang *College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Weizhi Chen *College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Minghao YangCollege of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Lamei JiangCollege of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Ze WangCollege of Resources and Environment, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Cai RenCollege of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.
Xianhua ZhangCollege of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Seed polymorphism, defined as the production of two or more types of diaspores with distinct morphology and ecological function within a species, represents a bet-hedging strategy that enables plants to cope with unpredictable spatiotemporal environmental variability. Previous studies have mainly focused on annual plants; therefore, little is known about in perennial species, particularly in desert constructive plants. Methods: This study investigated seed polymorphism in Results and discussion: Seed polymorphism was prevalent across natural populations within the study region, with different plants producing three distinctly colored diaspores: YY (yellow fruit-wing perianth and yellow pericarp), YP (yellow fruit-wing perianth and pink pericarp), and PP (pink fruit-wing perianth and pink pericarp). The fruit/diaspore biomass and gibberellic acid/abscisic acid ratio were the lowest in YY (0.611 and 0.64, respectively) and the highest in YP (0.684 and 1.56). YY plants exhibited grater drought resistant and produced fewer but more robust seedlings, ensuring population persistence. YP seeds have a higher germination percentage, germination rate, and emergence percentage, facilitating rapid population expansion under favorable conditions. PP seeds showed reduced germination under salt stress, suggesting a potential role as a persistent soil seed bank. These results indicate that

Indexed as

bionomic strategyextreme environmentgermination and seedling establishmentHaloxylon ammodendronseed polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID40276717
PMCPMC12018425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.