ArticleOTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma2025
Mental health resources for orthopaedic trauma patient care: a survey of orthopaedic trauma association members.
Article in OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of mental health outcomes in major versus minor upper extremity amputations: a retrospective national database study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Limited attention in prior work has been placed on delivery of mental health care to patients with orthopaedic trauma. The purpose of this project was to describe current attitudes regarding the importance of mental healthcare and assess the availability of mental health resources for patients with orthopaedic trauma. Methods: A 16-item web-based questionnaire was advertised to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA/AO). This cross-sectional survey evaluated current practice patterns, perceived need, and access to mental health resources. Results: One hundred twenty-four OTA/AO members completed the survey, 98% of whom believe mental health resources are needed for patients. Yet, 71% never or rarely take a mental health history from new patients with trauma. Eighty-six respondents (69%) have access to mental health resources for their patients, either within or external to their hospital system, but only 48% have access regardless of health insurance status. Psychiatry (n = 72, 87%) and psychology (n = 55, 66%) were most accessible. Surgeons with access to mental healthcare report positive impact on their patients' recovery (6.6/10, where 10 is most positive), while surgeons without access to mental health care report this has been detrimental to their patients' recovery (7.3/10). Conclusions: Nearly all OTA/AO members feel that access to mental health resources is paramount, but few surgeons consistently obtain a mental health history. Mental health resources are reportedly largely available for patients with orthopaedic trauma. These resources are predominately limited to psychiatry and psychology referrals, with a paucity of other support services including peer mentors and online communities. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.