ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Impact of clinical pharmacist interventions on medication administration via enteral feeding tubes in a neurology ward: a pre- and post-educational prospective study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introducing the Quality Target Administration (QTAP) Profile for Enteral Feeding Tube Medications.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of pharmacy students towards clinical pharmacy in Türkiye: insights from a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of clinical pharmacists' education and interventions on the appropriateness of dosage forms of drugs administered via the enteral feeding tubes (EFTs) in hospitalised patients in the neurology ward. Methods: This was a prospective, pre-post intervention study conducted among patients and neurologist team professionals in the neurology ward of a training and research hospital in Istanbul, Türkiye. The study was designed in two phases as a pre-education observation period (OP) and a post-education intervention period (IP), during which the clinical pharmacists provided the required recommendations. Medications evaluated in terms of EFT-related medication administration errors (EFTRMAE) during the hospitalisation and discharge of patients in OP and IP. The knowledge levels of the neurologist team regarding EFT medication administration were collected and evaluated with an online survey before and after the education program. Results: A total of 68 patients were included in the study, with 34 patients in the OP and 34 in the IP. During hospitalisation, EFTRMAEs were observed in 24 patients (70.6%) in the OP, whereas in the IP, EFTRMAEs were detected in 13 patients (38.2%) before clinical pharmacist interventions (p = 0.014). Throughout hospitalisation in the IP group, clinical pharmacists provided 25 interventions related to EFTRMAEs, of which 84% were accepted by physicians. However, only 11 of the accepted recommendations were fully implemented. Following these interventions, inappropriate drug administration via EFT remained in only 5 patients (14.7%) (p < 0.001). At hospital discharge, the EFTRMAE rate, which was 76.5% in the OP group, decreased to 23.5% in the IP group (p < 0.001). The neurologist team's knowledge of EFT medication administration improved significantly following clinical pharmacist education, with the average number of correct responses increasing from 16.1 ± 4 before the education to 21.1 ± 2.1 afterward (p < 0.001). Conclusion: EFTRMAEs are frequently encountered in patients hospitalised in the neurology ward. Including clinical pharmacists in the healthcare team and the education program provided to physicians and nurses will increase the knowledge level of participants and the ability of physicians to prescribe appropriate dosage forms for administration via EFT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.