ReviewMolecular genetics and metabolism reports2025
Expert review in diagnostic, therapeutic and follow-up of Fabry disease in Latin America based on patient care standards.
Review in Molecular genetics and metabolism reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence and sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic characteristics of Fabry disease in north-central Chile, 2013-2023.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2026Article
- Exploring a plasma proteomic biosignature associated with cardiac involvement in Fabry disease.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal sphingolipidosis. It is caused by pathogenic variants in the GLA gene with a consequent deficiency of the enzyme α-galactosidase A, resulting in the pathological accumulation of glycolipids - mainly globotriosyl ceramide (GL-3, GB3) and its deacylated product, globotriaosylsphingosine (Lyso-Gb-3) - in plasma and in a wide variety of cell types throughout the human body; it is characterized as a chronic, multisystemic disease with progressive evolution, which causes deterioration of the patient's quality of life and decreases survival and life expectancy.In Latin America there are different limitations to the management of patients with Fabry disease, in most countries, access to diagnostic tools and treatment on time is complex and can sometimes suffer delays in its implementation. This situation is due to the high costs to health systems of follow-up and pharmacological therapy for Fabry patients, creating barriers to timely access. Conclusions: Although medical criteria are fundamental in the choice of pharmacological therapy, the final decision should also rely on the patient's choice according to their expectations and the adherence and compliance with the treatment that they are willing to follow. As it has been described, there are currently three therapeutic options, for which the appropriate profile must be defined to achieve the best clinical outcomes, considering that it is a permanent treatment; experts consider that Fabry patients need comprehensive and interdisciplinary management to stop the progression and functional deterioration of the affected organs by its multiple systemic manifestations. In Latin-American countries, it is difficult to guarantee this comprehensive and coordinated management, due to limited public policies related to orphan diseases diagnosis, treatment and follow up.It is considered crucial to structure support networks specialized in Fabry disease and generate partnerships with health institutions and other health system stakeholders, that would articulate and coordinate patients and relatives counseling and management, establish the specific pharmacological treatment to reduce the progression of the disease and the systemic involvement, deciding between the administration of enzyme replacement therapy or the most recent option of oral management with pharmacological chaperone both with proven effectiveness. This will be the decision of the attending physician, who will propose and advise the therapeutic choice that best suits the patient's needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.