ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Use of telephone calls to manage glycemic control at Mexico's northern border.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Telephone calls were used for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients during the Covid-19 pandemic. The study's objective was to determine the factors that favor glycemic control in patients with T2DM using telephone calls in the Mexico's northern border. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with T2DM patients from the Family Medicine Unit 33 in Reynosa, Tamaulipas, from June 2021 to June 2022. The evaluation of glycemic control involved measuring glycated hemoglobin at the beginning and end of telephone follow-up. Clinical, demographic, social, and laboratory factors were analyzed using univariate and bivariate statistical methods to compare initial and final glycemic control, finally, two logistic regression models were estimated considering glycemic control as a binary variable. Results: A total of 287 participants were followed up, comprising 122 men and 165 women, where 71.78% received nine or more phone calls. Initially, 49.13% had glycemic control, but by the end of the follow-up, it increased by 7%. Females show an Odds Ratio (OR) of 0.475 (95% CI 0.269-0.838), high-density lipid levels with an OR = 0.982 (p=0.078), and 11 follow-up telephone calls with an OR = 0.403 (95% CI 0.165-0.985), which represented factors contributing to glycemic control. Poor glycemic control is more likely in individuals with a high cardiovascular risk, with an OR of 2.193 (p=0.085). Conclusion: Cell phone calls can effectively control glycemia in T2DM patients. Therefore, they can be used as a substitute for in-person medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.