ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Unlocking Gait Analysis Beyond the Gait Lab: High-Fidelity Replication of Knee Kinematics Using Inertial Motion Units and a Convolutional Neural Network.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative assessment of thoracolumbosacral orthosis efficacy on the temporal features of gait using inertial measurement unit sensors.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Smart Total Knee Replacement: Recognition of Activities of Daily Living Using Embedded IMU Sensors and a Novel AI Model in a Cadaveric Proof-of-Concept Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gait analysis using three-dimensional motion capture systems (3D motion capture) provides a combination of kinematic and kinetic measurements for quantifying and characterizing the motion and loads, respectively, of lower extremity joints during human movement. However, their high cost and limited accessibility impact their utility. Wearable inertial motion sensors offer a cost-effective alternative to measure simple temporospatial variables, but more complex kinematic variables require machine learning interfaces. We hypothesize that kinematic measures about the knee collected using motion capture can be replicated by coupling raw data collected from inertial measurement units (IMUs) to machine learning algorithms. Methods: Data from 40 healthy participants performing fixed walking, stair climbing, and sit-to-stand tasks were collected using both 3D motion capture and IMUs. Sequence to sequence convolutional neural networks were trained to map IMU data to three motion capture kinematic outputs: right knee angle, right knee angular velocity, and right hip angle. Model performance was assessed using mean absolute error. Results: The convolutional neural network models exhibited high accuracy in replicating motion capture-derived kinematic variables. Mean absolute error values for right knee angle ranged from 4.30 ± 1.55 to 5.79 ± 2.93 degrees, for right knee angular velocity from 7.82 ± 3.01 to 22.16 ± 9.52 degrees per second, and for right hip angle from 4.82 ± 2.29 to 8.63 ± 4.73 degrees. Task-specific variations in accuracy were observed. Conclusions: The findings highlight the potential of leveraging raw data from wearable inertial sensors and machine learning algorithms to reproduce gait lab-quality kinematic data outside the laboratory settings for the study of knee function following joint injury, surgery, or the progression of joint disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.