Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276526›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2025

Unlocking Gait Analysis Beyond the Gait Lab: High-Fidelity Replication of Knee Kinematics Using Inertial Motion Units and a Convolutional Neural Network.

Stefano A Bini, Nicholas Gillian, Thomas A Peterson, Richard B Souza, Brooke Schultz, Wojciech Mormul, Marek K Cichoń, Agnieszka Barbara Szczotka, Ivan Poupyrev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stefano A BiniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Nicholas GillianGoogle Advanced Technology & Projects (ATAP) Invention Studio, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Thomas A PetersonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Richard B SouzaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brooke SchultzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Wojciech MormulDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Marek K CichońDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Agnieszka Barbara SzczotkaDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ivan PoupyrevDepartment of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gait analysis using three-dimensional motion capture systems (3D motion capture) provides a combination of kinematic and kinetic measurements for quantifying and characterizing the motion and loads, respectively, of lower extremity joints during human movement. However, their high cost and limited accessibility impact their utility. Wearable inertial motion sensors offer a cost-effective alternative to measure simple temporospatial variables, but more complex kinematic variables require machine learning interfaces. We hypothesize that kinematic measures about the knee collected using motion capture can be replicated by coupling raw data collected from inertial measurement units (IMUs) to machine learning algorithms. Methods: Data from 40 healthy participants performing fixed walking, stair climbing, and sit-to-stand tasks were collected using both 3D motion capture and IMUs. Sequence to sequence convolutional neural networks were trained to map IMU data to three motion capture kinematic outputs: right knee angle, right knee angular velocity, and right hip angle. Model performance was assessed using mean absolute error. Results: The convolutional neural network models exhibited high accuracy in replicating motion capture-derived kinematic variables. Mean absolute error values for right knee angle ranged from 4.30 ± 1.55 to 5.79 ± 2.93 degrees, for right knee angular velocity from 7.82 ± 3.01 to 22.16 ± 9.52 degrees per second, and for right hip angle from 4.82 ± 2.29 to 8.63 ± 4.73 degrees. Task-specific variations in accuracy were observed. Conclusions: The findings highlight the potential of leveraging raw data from wearable inertial sensors and machine learning algorithms to reproduce gait lab-quality kinematic data outside the laboratory settings for the study of knee function following joint injury, surgery, or the progression of joint disease.

Indexed as

Gait analysisInertial motion sensorsKnee kinematicsMachine learningMusculoskeletal researchWearables

Identifiers

PMID40276526
PMCPMC12020888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.