ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025
Uncertainty-guided pancreatic tumor auto-segmentation with Tversky ensemble.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Applications of Quantitative Imaging and Artificial Intelligence for Pancreatic Cance.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Pancreatic gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation is challenging due to their variable morphology and uncertain ground truth. Previous deep learning-based auto-segmentation methods have struggled to handle tasks with uncertain ground truth and have not accommodated stylistic customizations. We aim to develop a human-in-the-loop pancreatic GTV segmentation tool using Tversky ensembles by leveraging uncertainty estimation techniques. Material and methods: In this study, we utilized a total of 282 patients from the pancreas task of the Medical Segmentation Decathlon. Thirty patients were randomly selected to form an independent test set, while the remaining 252 patients were divided into an 80-20 % training-validation split. We incorporated Tversky loss layer during training to train a five-member segmentation ensemble with varying contouring tendencies. The Tversky ensemble predicted probability maps by estimating pixel-level segmentation uncertainties. Probability thresholding was employed on the resulting probability maps to generate the final contours, from which eleven contours were extracted for quantitative evaluation against ground truths, with variations in the threshold values. Results: Our Tversky ensemble achieved DSC of 0.47, HD95 of 12.70 mm and MSD of 3.24 mm respectively using the optimal thresholding configuration. We outperformed the Swin-UNETR configuration that achieved the state-of-the-art result in the pancreas task of the medical segmentation decathlon. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the effectiveness of employing an ensemble-based uncertainty estimation technique for pancreatic tumor segmentation. The approach provided clinicians with a consensus probability map that could be fine-tuned in line with their preferences, generating contours with greater confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.