ArticleJournal of neuroendovascular therapy2025
Factors of Difficult Guiding Catheter Access in Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Anterior Circulation.
Article in Journal of neuroendovascular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vascular geometry characterization for AI-based endovascular navigation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Insertion of a guiding catheter (GC) system into the desired arterial site is crucial in mechanical thrombectomy (MT). This study assessed the factors of difficult GC access to the target carotid artery in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation. Methods: In total, 174 patients who had undergone MT were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of patients who could not undergo GC insertion to the target carotid artery, as well as the characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring a longer groin puncture-to-GC insertion time, were examined. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on the time from groin puncture to insertion into the target carotid artery: group A, within 10 min; group B, within 10-20 min; and group C, >20 min. In this study, the transfemoral catheter access was the primary option, and the approach site was changed based on the operator's discretion. Successful reperfusion was defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade ≥2B. A favorable outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. Results: Catheterization of the target carotid artery could not be performed in 8 (4.6%) patients, who were older and more likely to be female. The proportion of patients with a height ≤150 cm and the percentage of patients with a type III arch and/or tortuous common carotid artery (CCA) were high. The approach was changed in 4 (2.3%) patients, and GC insertion was successful in all cases. A significant difference was observed among the 3 groups in terms of age and the percentage of patients with a type III arch and/or CCA tortuosity and internal carotid artery occlusion. In addition, the time from groin puncture to recanalization significantly differed. The recanalization rate and the 90-day favorable outcome rate were significantly lower in patients with a groin puncture-to-GC insertion time >20 min. Conclusion: We need to make an effort to insert the GC within 20 min while actively considering changes in the approach, particularly in older patients and those with a type III arch and/or tortuous CCA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.