Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276450›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

A Scoping Review of Exosome Delivery Applications in Hair Loss.

Sarah Schaffer, Lily Tehrani, Braeden Koechle, Prathmica Chandramohan, Brookie Hilburn, Kawaiola Cael Aoki, Robin J Jacobs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah SchafferMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Lily TehraniMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Braeden KoechleMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Prathmica ChandramohanMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Brookie HilburnMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Kawaiola Cael AokiMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.
Robin J JacobsMedicine, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this scoping review was to understand the extent and type of evidence found in the current literature on the delivery mechanisms of exosome therapeutics and how these methods can work synergistically with existing treatments for alopecia. Alopecia is primarily characterized as non-scarring or scarring (cicatricial). In cicatricial alopecia, the hair follicles are irreversibly destroyed, causing permanent hair loss. In non-cicatricial alopecia, the hair follicles are undamaged, allowing for possible hair regeneration. Non-scarring alopecia includes androgenetic alopecia, telogen effluvium, and alopecia areata. Current treatments for non-scarring alopecia include oral minoxidil and spironolactone. Exosome therapeutics are a possible alternative treatment for non-scarring alopecia because of their regenerative properties in hair follicle stimulation, customizable size selection, and the potential to activate and down-regulate specific pathways that enhance hair growth. This review evaluates types and sources of exosome delivery as regenerative treatments for alopecia. A search of literature published in English from 2018 to 2023 was performed using the electronic databases EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science. Data from selected studies included specific details about the participants, concept, context, study methods, and key findings relevant to the review questions. Upon completion of the database search that yielded 1,087 citations, after removing 284 duplicates, 803 articles remained for assessment of eligibility. Finally, 16 studies were retained for inclusion. These studies explored one or more exosome delivery techniques, such as intradermal needle injection, microneedle patches, topical application, and topical application with a secondary assistive device. The therapeutic focus of these studies ranged from hair follicle regeneration and wound healing to spinal cord injury repair and collagen regeneration for cosmetic purposes. Most of the studies (14 out of 16) used exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), while others isolated exosomes from human adipose stem cells, macrophage cell lines, and dermal fibroblast cells. Of the 16 studies, all but two administered exosomes via microneedle patches. The findings suggest that intradermal microneedle patches are a promising method for delivering exosomes into tissues, particularly for the treatment of non-cicatricial alopecia. Exosome therapy shows strong potential for promoting hair follicle regeneration, supported by its proven efficacy in wound healing, spinal cord injury repair, and cosmetic applications. Among the various delivery methods explored, microneedle patches loaded with exosomes from MSCs emerged as the most effective for targeted delivery into tissues. These findings support exosome-based therapies for non-cicatricial alopecia.

Indexed as

alopeciaexosomeextracellular vesicleshair regenerationlaser therapymicroneedling

Identifiers

PMID40276450
PMCPMC12020662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.