ArticleCureus2025
Virtual Reality Simulation in Interprofessional Pediatric Cardiology Education.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: Present Applications and Future Directions.Pediatric reports · 2026Review
- Transforming Pediatric Cardiology Fellowship Education: Multi-center Outcomes of the MACH-3 Virtual Reality Program for HLHS.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Precision nutrition in diabetic foot ulcers: multimodal artificial intelligence for personalized metabolic management.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction In acute care settings, pediatric congenital heart patients require comprehensive team-based care. Physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) co-manage these patients in the same manner. However, there may be few opportunities to train together. Virtual reality (VR) simulation in the pediatric cardiology setting offers a portable, immersive experience and can be a cost-saving alternative to traditional manikin-based simulation. We sought to study the effectiveness of VR as a tool for providing interprofessional education to physicians and APPs working with cardiology patients in both the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) and the emergency department (ED). Methods Physicians and APP pairs who clinically manage pediatric cardiology patients in the emergency department, cardiology acute care, and CICUs were identified to participate in two of eight VR simulations developed by a stand-alone pediatric hospital. The APP specialty was used to determine the appropriate selection of simulations for each provider pair. Four scenarios were designed in a virtual CICU, and four were in a virtual ED. Each physician-APP pair met for one hour, during which a 10-minute orientation, a five- to 10-minute simulation, a 10-minute debrief, and a second simulation were conducted. Each simulation was based on actual clinical situations, including five priority objectives for patient management to be met in five minutes or less, and whether a physician or APP initiated each objective was recorded. Following the VR simulations, participants completed a debrief and exit questionnaire. Results Seventeen physician-APP pairs participated in 33 simulations. An average of 3.4 objectives were met across all scenarios. Of the objectives met, 41% were initiated by an APP. Thirty-one participants completed post-simulation surveys. All agreed or strongly agreed that the VR environment enhanced their simulation experience and believed VR-based simulation could be useful for education in various pediatric settings. Conclusion Virtual reality simulation offers an immersive educational experience for providers across different professions within a pediatric cardiology setting. Further endeavors include evaluating bedside nurses' use of VR and comparing the use of VR with manikin-based approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.