Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276418›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Peri- and Postoperative Complications in Abdominal, Vaginal Extraperitoneal, and Vaginal Intraperitoneal Colpopexy.

Kimberly C Lince, Devki Patel, Vaishnavi J Patel, Young Son, Virgil DeMario, Sara Sar, David Sussman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kimberly C LinceDepartment of Clinically Applied Science Education, University of the Incarnate Word School of Osteopathic Medicine, San Antonio, USA.
Devki PatelOffice of Research and Innovation, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Lubbock, USA.
Vaishnavi J PatelOffice of Research and Innovation, University of the Incarnate Word School of Osteopathic Medicine, San Antonio, USA.
Young SonDepartment of Urology, Jefferson Stratford Hospital, Stratford, USA.
Virgil DeMarioDepartment of Clinical and Applied Science Education, University of the Incarnate Word School of Osteopathic Medicine, San Antonio, USA.
Sara SarOffice of Research, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
David SussmanDepartment of Urology, Jefferson Washington Township Hospital, Sewell, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a very common concern for women that can often necessitate surgical intervention, including sacral colpopexy. There are multiple surgical approaches, including vaginal, extraperitoneal, and intraperitoneal. This study aims to identify predictors of the outcomes with the different surgical approaches. Methods This retrospective study utilized data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) gynecologic-specific database for those who underwent sacral colpopexy for POP. The group was subdivided into surgical approaches that included abdominal, vaginal extraperitoneal, and vaginal intraperitoneal. ANOVA analysis was performed between the three groups, and a multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the 30-day complication rate. Results Among the 1,275 cases analyzed, 326 (25.6%) utilized an abdominal approach, 425 (33.3%) utilized a vaginal approach, and 524 (41.1%) utilized an extraperitoneal approach. The mean age was significantly higher for patients undergoing a vaginal extraperitoneal (64.5 years) compared to abdominal (62.1 years) and vaginal intraperitoneal (61.6 years). There was no difference in the 30-day complication rate between the surgical approaches on adjusted analysis; however, the vaginal extraperitoneal approach had the longest hospital stay, days from operation to discharge, and total operation time. Conclusion A variety of surgical approaches for sacral colpopexy can be employed. In our study, we show that the 30-day complication rate was similar between the three approaches; however, the complications were only significant with the abdominal approach showing an increased occurrence of bleeding transfusions when compared to the extraperitoneal approach.

Indexed as

abdominal colpopexyabdominal sacro colpopexyacs-nsqipcolpopexynational surgical quality improvement program (nsqip)nsqipsurgical complicationsurgical outcomesurgical techniquesvaginal colpopexy

Identifiers

PMID40276418
PMCPMC12018216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.