ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025
The effects of blood flow restriction training on post activation potentiation and fatigue level: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of exercise snacks on physical function: a systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2026Pooled it
- The effects of lower limb blood flow restriction training on post-activation potentiation enhancement and fatigue: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of blood flow restriction training with different intermittent durations on the post-activation potentiation of lower limbs:a meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Blood Flow Restriction Training, Molecular Modulators, and Musculoskeletal Health: A Scoping Review and Translational Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Acute effects of different blood flow restriction conditioning protocols on countermovement and squat jump performance.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to comprehensively explore the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) training on the post-activation potentiation (PAP) and the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) through meta-analysis, so as to provide a scientific basis for athletes' physical fitness training. Methods: The PubMed, CNKI, Web of Science and EBSCO databases were searched to look for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of BFRT on post-activation potentiation (PAP) and the rating of perceived exertion (RPE). The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to screen the literature. With the help of Revman 5.4 and Stata 17.0 software, the literature quality assessment and statistical analysis were completed. Meanwhile, sensitivity analysis and funnel plots were utilized to examine the stability of the results and the publication bias. Results: A total of 31 related studies were included, among which 22 studies focused on the relationship between BFR training and PAP, covering 347 participants. Meta-analysis showed that BFRT could significantly affect PAP [ Conclusion: Blood flow restriction training can induce the occurrence of post-activation potentiation (PAP). BFR exercises with 40%-70% 1RM and ≤50% AOP are more likely to stimulate PAP. Meanwhile, BFR training will significantly affect the rating of perceived exertion (RPE). BFR training under mixed oxygen training and with a compressive strength of ≥60% AOP has a stronger perception of fatigue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.