Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276354›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Socioeconomic status in the association between use of personal care products and exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in pregnant Taiwanese women.

Alexander Waits, Chia-Huang Chang, Yu-Fang Huang, Ming-Song Tsai, Jia-Woei Hou, Pei-Wei Wang, Chih-Yao Chen, Chia-Jung Hsieh, Ming-Tsang Wu, Shu-Li Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexander WaitsSchool of Medicine, Institute of Public Health, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Huang ChangSchool of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Fang HuangSchool of Medicine, Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Song TsaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jia-Woei HouDepartment of Pediatrics, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pei-Wei WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Yao ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and High-Risk Pregnancy, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Jung HsiehDepartment of Public Health, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Ming-Tsang WuResearch Center for Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Shu-Li WangDivision of Environmental Health and Occupational Medicine, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.
Mei-Lien ChenSchool of Medicine, Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Maternal exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), particularly those found in personal care products (PCPs), may affect child development. Socioeconomic inequalities in EDC exposure warrant further investigation. This study assessed the role of income and education in the association between PCP use and exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) and parabens in pregnant women. Methods: Associations between PCP use and urinary concentrations of BPA and four parabens in pregnant women from the Taiwan Maternal and Infant Cohort Study were estimated using linear regression, with results expressed as the percentage change in concentrations for each additional PCP use per week. The analysis was stratified by income and education and predicted concentrations, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) was graphed according to the frequency of PCP use. Results: Higher concentrations of methylparaben, ethylparaben, and propylparaben were associated with more frequent use of different PCPs, especially makeup. The above-lowest income group showed positive associations between frequency use of rinse-off PCPs and methylparaben (2.5%, 95%CI = 0.9%, 4.0%), propylparaben (2.8%, 95%CI = 0.3%, 5.3%), and between leave-on PCPs and methylparaben (3.1%, 95%CI = 1.8%, 4.4%), ethylparaben (2.2%, 95%CI = 0.1%, 4.2%), and propylparaben (2.8%, 95%CI = 0.8%, 4.9%). BPA was negatively associated with rinse-off PCPs (-1.2%, 95%CI = -2.3%, -0.2%). A positive association between leave-on PCPs and BPA was suggested in the lowest income group (1.7%, 95%CI = -0.4%, 3.7%). Predicted BPA concentrations were significantly higher in the lowest income group at higher frequencies of PCP use. Stratification by education showed the strongest associations in the postgraduate group for rinse-off PCPs with methylparaben (6.1%, 95%CI = 1.9%, 10.5%) and propylparaben (6.9%, 95%CI = 1.2%, 12.9%), as well as for leave-on PCPs with methylparaben (4.1%, 95%CI = 1.2%, 7.2%). Conclusion: The associations observed between various PCPs and parabens suggest that reducing the use of certain PCPs in pregnant women could help lower paraben exposure. Higher levels of BPA in the lowest income group require further investigation of sources of BPA exposure, especially in disadvantaged populations.

Indexed as

CosmeticsEndocrine DisruptorsMaternal ExposureSocial ClassAdultBenzhydryl CompoundsBisphenol A CompoundsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansParabensPhenolsPregnancyTaiwanBenzhydryl Compoundsbisphenol ABisphenol A CompoundsCosmeticsEndocrine DisruptorsParabensPhenolsbisphenol Aincomeparabenspersonal care productspregnancysocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID40276354
PMCPMC12019293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.