ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
Machine learning-enhanced screening funnel for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Invisible to Enrolled: How Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Clinical Trial Recruitment.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Article
- Adaptive cascading artificial intelligence for Alzheimer's disease assessment: a clinically oriented narrative review and implementation framework.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Clinical impact of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of studies using ADNI data (2023 to June 2025).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Predicting future cognitive impairment in preclinical Alzheimer's disease using multimodal imaging: a multisite machine learning study.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Machine learning-enhanced screening funnel for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials with therapeutic interventions require hundreds of subjects to be studied over many months/years due to variable and slow disease progression. This article presents a novel screening paradigm integrating disease progression models to improve trial efficiency by identifying appropriate candidates for early phase clinical studies.
methodsA traditional screening funnel is enhanced using machine learning models, including 3D convolutional neural networks and ensemble models, which integrate neuroimaging, demographic, genetic, and clinical data.
resultsThis approach predicts clinical progression (2-year Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes change > 1) with an area under the curve of 0.836. Incorporating it into trials (with maximized sensitivity/specificity optimization) could reduce the number of subjects required by 55%, shorten recruitment by 13 months, and reduce screening amyloid positron emission tomography scans by 72%. DISCUSSION: By reducing patient burden and shortening timelines in clinical trials, this enhanced screening funnel could accelerate the development of AD therapies. Highlights: An innovative screening funnel was developed to improve Alzheimer's disease clinical trial efficiency.The funnel incorporates machine learning (ML)-based disease progression models.The ML model identifies patients with progression rate optimal for clinical trials.Unsuitable patients would fail early in the funnel before burdensome imaging procedures.This screening funnel is customizable to specific study needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.