ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)
Constructive engagement in cognitive stimulation therapy groups among people with dementia: A mixed-methods study.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Constructive engagement in cognitive stimulation therapy groups among people with dementia: A mixed-methods study.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clinical guidelines recommend personalized activities and group cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) for promoting cognition, independence, and well-being in persons with dementia. Constructive engagement (CE), the state of being occupied positively in purposeful activities, is theoretically an essential process in personalized activities and CST. However, whether CE develops over time and what contributes to it are unknown. We investigated changes in CE during CST and its contributors. Methods: This is a mixed-methods study. We used time sampling to record the time proportion of persons with dementia ( Results: Persons with dementia spent 51% and 46% of their time in constructive and passive engagement, respectively. Time of engagement in non-task-related activities and non-engagement was minimal. CE remained stable at around 50% of activity time throughout the intervention course, except for a slight increase from the early to middle phase (48% to 55%, F (2224) = 3.779, Discussions: Group CST engages persons with dementia well, regardless of their differences in gender and literacy levels. CE remained relatively stable during CST, and younger, more physically and cognitively able people showed slightly greater CE. In group-based interventions, facilitators' skills and techniques could enhance CE. Future studies may focus on how CE as a plausible change mechanism further improves the intervention outcomes of persons with dementia. Highlights: Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is a non-pharmacological intervention that involves group-based activities and exercises to improve cognition and quality of life for persons with dementia, but the specific mechanisms behind it are not yet fully understood.This study is the first to investigate constructive engagement (CE), which describes active involvement in meaningful activities or complex interventions, specifically CST, for persons with dementia.CST engages them well, regardless of gender and literacy differences. CE time increases at the early intervention phase and stabilizes later on. CE occupies around half of the intervention time throughout CST, which can still be further increased by activity design and facilitators' skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.