Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276259›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Reliability of hemodynamic parameters measured by bioimpedance cardiography at different intensities during incremental exercise testing.

Raphael Schoch, Jonathan Wagner, Max Niemeyer, Fabienne Bruggisser, Denis Infanger, Justin Carrard, Benedikt Gasser, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss, Raphael Knaier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Raphael SchochDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jonathan WagnerDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Max NiemeyerDepartment Medicine, Training and Health, Institute of Sport Science and Motology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Fabienne BruggisserDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Denis InfangerDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Justin CarrardDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Benedikt GasserDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Arno Schmidt-TrucksässDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Raphael KnaierDepartment of Sport, Exercise and Health, Division Sports and Exercise Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bioimpedance cardiography offers a non-invasive and time-efficient method to measure hemodynamic parameters. Previous studies only investigated its reliability under steady-state conditions and at maximum load but not at ventilatory thresholds (VTs). This is the first study that assesses the reliability of measured hemodynamic parameters at different exercise stages during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using prespecified strict criteria to assess reliability. Methods: Data from 31 healthy, well-trained adults were analyzed. Each participant completed two CPETs, both following the same ramp protocol, with a 7-day interval between them. Hemodynamic parameters were measured with the PhysioFlow® (Manatec Biomedical, Poissy, France) at characteristic phases and thresholds [VT1, VT2, and peak oxygen uptake (V̇O Results: Heart rate, stroke volume, and cardiac output demonstrated good reliability on a group level (mean intraclass correlation >0.75) at both thresholds (0.91, 0.80, and 0.77 at P Conclusion: The PhysioFlow® reliably measures heart rate, stroke volume, and cardiac output during CPET on a group level. However, as shown by the Bland-Altman plots, the reliability is too low to be used for individual comparisons.

Indexed as

hemodynamic parametersimpedance cardiographypeak oxygen uptakereliabilitystroke volume

Identifiers

PMID40276259
PMCPMC12018426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.