Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276232›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2025

Comparison of the characteristics of phenolic compounds in Se-enriched kiwifruit and conventional kiwifruit.

Ye Zheng, Fang Luo, Li Wang, Shuyi Li, Xuehua Wang, Zhenzhou Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ye ZhengNational R&D Center for Se-rich Agricultural Products Processing, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.
Fang LuoNational R&D Center for Se-rich Agricultural Products Processing, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.
Li WangNational R&D Center for Se-rich Agricultural Products Processing, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.
Shuyi LiNational R&D Center for Se-rich Agricultural Products Processing, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.
Xuehua WangNational R&D Center for Se-rich Agricultural Products Processing, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.
Zhenzhou ZhuNational R&D Center for Se-rich Agricultural Products Processing, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While selenium (Se) fortification significantly influences plant secondary metabolism, there has been limited research on its effects on the phenolic profile of kiwifruit. This study aimed to characterize and compare the phenolic profile of Se-enriched and conventional kiwifruit. A total of 463 phenolic compounds were identified. Among these, nine common differential metabolites, including six flavonoids, two phenolic acids, and one lignan (massoniresinol), were identified between Se-enriched and conventional kiwifruit of the same variety. Further comparative analysis of diverse varieties indicated that massoniresinol was the sole differential metabolite. This metabolite was found to be significantly up-regulated in Se-enriched kiwifruit compared to conventional kiwifruit. In addition, correlation analysis showed that the total Se, phenol, and flavonoids content were highly significantly positively correlated with antioxidant activities in kiwifruit. These findings enhance our understanding of the phenolic composition in Se-enriched and conventional kiwifruit and provide a potential biomarker for distinguishing Se-enriched from conventional kiwifruit.

Indexed as

Antioxidant activityKiwifruitPhenolic compoundsSe-enrichedUntargeted metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID40276232
PMCPMC12018201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.