ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Analysis of non-halal meat adulteration in beef meatball using real-time PCR and mitochondrial D-loop gen-specific primer.
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Indonesia, home to the world's largest Muslim population, enforces Law No. 33 of 2014, mandating halal certification for all products in the country. However, meatballs, a popular Indonesian dish, frequently fall victim to adulteration with non-halal meats, such as pork and wild boar due to economic incentives. Aim: This study aims to develop an analytical technique employing real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with specific primers to detect pork and wild boar meat within beef meatballs. Method: The research commenced with the design of specific primers for pork and wild boar DNA via IDT software. Subsequent phases encompassed DNA isolation, specificity, linearity, limit of detection, efficiency, and repeatability assessments to evaluate the method. Results: The D-Loop 539 and D-Loop 409 primers successfully detected the pork and wild boar DNA in both raw meat and meatballs, with optimal annealing temperatures of 61.2°C and 60.6°C, respectively. The D-loop 539 primer amplified pork DNA and pork-infused meatballs, boasting a detection threshold of 0.1 ng, with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 0.25%. Similarly, the D-loop 409 primer successfully amplified wild boar DNA and meatball sample, showcasing detection limits of 1 and 0.1 ng, accompanied by CV values of 0.37% and 0.44%. All primers passed the critical PCR validation tests, making them suitable for analysis of meatball samples across 12 sub-districts in Sleman-Yogyakarta. The observed results showed negative amplification signals for both pork and wild boar components. Conclusion: Using the D-Loop 539 and D-Loop 409 primers, this method is capable to detect the presence of pork and wild boar meat within beef meatballs This research contributes to the authentication of halal products in alignment with the provisions of Law No. 33 of 2014, thereby endorsing consumer confidence in product integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.