ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vitro Antitrypanosomal and Antibacterial Activity of Aqueous, Hydroethanolic and Ethanolic Extracts of Rumex obtusifolius L. Leaf and Root.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Article
- Anticestodial Efficacy and GC-MS Study of Evolvulus nummularius, a Traditionally Used Anthelmintic Plant of North-East India.Acta parasitologica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The management of helminthiasis remains a significant challenge in clinical and veterinary practice because the most important parasites have acquired extensive drug resistance in animal infections and reduced efficacy in human conditions. The toothache plant ( Aim: Experiments were set up to characterize the bioactive compound of the plant and assess its antiparasitic activity against intestinal cestodes and nematodes. Methods: The aerial parts of the plants were extracted with hexane in a Soxhlet apparatus. The extract was concentrated and fractionated using column chromatography. The elution was performed with Results: A single compound was eluted from column chromatography as indicated by TLC at an Conclusion: This study presents a showcase of the isolation of lupeol from the toothache plant and demonstrates the utility of the compound as a broad-spectrum antiparasitic molecule against cestodes and nematodes. The findings of this study encourage further investigations on the mode of action, molecular interactions, and other pharmacological properties of the compounds for drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.