ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Screening for antibodies against zoonotic infections among employees of the Tripoli Zoo in Libya.
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Animal handlers in zoological settings are at an increased risk of zoonotic disease transmission due to close contact with animals, waste, and parasites. Research on occupational zoonotic infections in zoos, however, remains limited. This is particularly relevant in the context of the Tripoli Zoo, which has been closed since 2013 and is planned to reopen under new management. Aim: This study investigated the seroprevalence of Methods: Blood samples were collected from 93 zoo employees and tested for IgG antibodies against the target pathogens using serological methods. Associations between seropositivity and various demographic and occupational factors were also examined. Results: In this study, 87.1% of the employees tested positive for at least one zoonotic pathogen IgG antibody, with Conclusion: The high seroprevalence of zoonotic infections among zoo employees underscores the urgent need for implementing effective preventive measures to protect staff health and minimize the risk of zoonotic disease transmission, especially in light of the zoo's planned reopening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.