ReviewDEN open2025
A meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy employing electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents for biliary drainage after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Review in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-biliary drainage and choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDD) are increasingly being used as alternative procedures for biliary drainage in patients in whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography fails. Novel electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents (EC-LAMS) are expected to be widely used for EUS-CDD. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the technical and clinical success of EUS-CDD using EC-LAMS. Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of several databases from inception to May 2022 to search for relevant studies on the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage using EC-LAMS. The pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and early and late adverse events were calculated. Results: Ten studies with a total of 481 patients were included in this analysis. The overall technical success rate was 94.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] (91.5%-96.2%), The overall clinical success rate was 94.9%, 95% CI (92%-96.7%). The overall early adverse event rate was 5.1%, 95% CI (3.4%-7.8%), and the overall late adverse event rate was 10.8%, 95% CI (6.6%-17.2%). Conclusion: In patients with biliary obstruction with failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, EUS-CDD using EC-LAMS is a good alternate management option with a high success rate and relatively low adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.