Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276122›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology science

Optical Strategy Utilizing Contrast Modulation to Slow Myopia.

James S Wolffsohn, Kate L Gifford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Impact of Myopia Control Spectacle Lens Designs on Visual Function.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Clinical evaluation of MyoCare in Europe (CEME) for myopia management: One-year results.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Trial
  4. Spectacle lenses for control of myopia progression in children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James S WolffsohnSchool of Optometry, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Kate L GiffordOptometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new method to slow myopia progression utilizes Diffusion Optics Technology (DOT) spectacle lenses. The proposed mechanism of action for the DOT lenses is to modulate contrast across the photoreceptor cells, leading to an altered activity of the ON and OFF pathways and slowing the progression of axial elongation. This approach is different from the current optical approaches that utilize optical defocus to reduce hyperopic defocus at the peripheral retina although central vision is fully corrected to slow myopia. Initial clinical studies with the DOT lenses have demonstrated promising results with a reduction in progression of myopia. This overview summarizes the current knowledge on myopia risk factors, the evidence for involvement of contrast signaling pathways in refractive error development, and the theories and mechanisms behind DOT lens technology. It also considers the role of contrast and the paradoxical observations given the established paradigm of form deprivation in animal models. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Contrast modulationDiffusion opticsMyopia controlON–OFF pathways

Identifiers

PMID40276122
PMCPMC12018563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.