Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276111›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025

Understanding Barriers and Motivations: Enhancing Support for UK Medical Students' Participation in Foreign Medical Electives.

Shazia Sarela, Naireen Asim, Shruthi Atapaka, Vafie Sheriff, Gabriela Anna Barzyk-Sheriff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shazia SarelaUCL Medical School, University College London, London, UK.
Naireen Asim *St George's University of London Medical School, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Shruthi Atapaka *St George's University of London Medical School, St George's University of London, London, UK.
Vafie SheriffRoyal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.
Gabriela Anna Barzyk-SheriffRoyal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to explore UK medical students' preferences, motivations, and barriers regarding international electives and to evaluate the impact of an online planning event designed to address these. Additionally, this study examined trends in UK medical students completing foreign electives over the past decade. Methods: Freedom of Information requests were sent to 46 UK medical universities requesting data on the number of students undertaking foreign electives over the past 10 years. Attendees at a peer-led event regarding electives completed a survey on their motivations and challenges in doing a foreign elective, followed by a post-event feedback form. Results were analysed using the Python Scipy package. Results: Of the 103 respondents, 76.7% preferred to undertake an international elective, while 21.36% preferred a combination of the UK and international locations. Non-academic reasons were significant motivators for undertaking a foreign elective, while safety and financial concerns were major deterrents. The online event received positive feedback, with participants appreciating the utility of the event in aiding their understanding of the elective planning process. Conclusion: UK medical students show a strong preference for international electives, despite significant barriers, particularly related to safety and finances. The peer-led event proved to be effective in supporting students' planning of electives.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemiccultural competenciesinternational medical educationmedical student electiveundergraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID40276111
PMCPMC12019687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.