ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Understanding Barriers and Motivations: Enhancing Support for UK Medical Students' Participation in Foreign Medical Electives.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving the Ethical Permissibility of Medical Electives in Lower-Resource Settings.Developing world bioethics · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of a "5E+AI" teaching model on science communication in medical students: a contribution to global health literacy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to explore UK medical students' preferences, motivations, and barriers regarding international electives and to evaluate the impact of an online planning event designed to address these. Additionally, this study examined trends in UK medical students completing foreign electives over the past decade. Methods: Freedom of Information requests were sent to 46 UK medical universities requesting data on the number of students undertaking foreign electives over the past 10 years. Attendees at a peer-led event regarding electives completed a survey on their motivations and challenges in doing a foreign elective, followed by a post-event feedback form. Results were analysed using the Python Scipy package. Results: Of the 103 respondents, 76.7% preferred to undertake an international elective, while 21.36% preferred a combination of the UK and international locations. Non-academic reasons were significant motivators for undertaking a foreign elective, while safety and financial concerns were major deterrents. The online event received positive feedback, with participants appreciating the utility of the event in aiding their understanding of the elective planning process. Conclusion: UK medical students show a strong preference for international electives, despite significant barriers, particularly related to safety and finances. The peer-led event proved to be effective in supporting students' planning of electives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.