ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Functional assessment of renal damage in children with primary vesicoureteral reflux.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric magnetic resonance urography from patient preparation to post-processing: basics and controversies.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Predictive value of ultrasound findings for high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in children: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the renal function damage in children with primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Methods: A total of 226 children with VUR (65 cases with left, 39 with right, and 122 cases with bilateral VUR) were screened. Eighty-five urinary tract infection (UTI) cases, without urinary malformations, during the same period were collected as controls. Age at diagnosis, body weight, renal ultrasound, VUR grade, serum creatinine level, dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) level, and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) values were retrospectively analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences in age at diagnosis between study groups. Total ERPF was significantly lower in the bilateral VUR group than in the control group. The ERPF in unilateral VUR was significantly lower than that in the contralateral or ipsilateral side in the control group ( Conclusion: Split renal function was impaired in the reflux kidney. The total ERPF in the bilateral VUR group was lower than that in the unilateral VUR group. Renal damage was correlated with a VUR grade, a transverse diameter, and pyelectasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.