ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Academic performance and its associated factors among khat-chewer and non-khat chewer high school students in Ethiopia, 2023.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Academic performance measures student achievement and is assessed using school exams and ongoing evaluations. Regular khat consumption can negatively affect neurocognitive function, decision-making, and problem-solving abilities, leading to decreased academic achievement, especially in Ethiopia. This study aimed to assess academic performance and associated factors among khat chewer and non-khat chewer high school students in Motta in northwestern Ethiopia in 2023. Methods: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted between April 26, and June 10, 2023, among 663 high school students, of whom 221 were khat chewers and 442 were non-chewers. A multistage sampling method was used to select participants. A structured, self-administered questionnaire was used to assess students' academic performance. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 25. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed at P < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval to identify statistically significant variables. Results: The study participants, 45 (20.7%) Khat chewers and 41 (9.4%) non-chewers, had failed/poor academic performance. Of the students who scored less than 50% on one subject, 83 were (38.2%) khat chewers and 107 (24.6%) were non-chewers. The mean of academic performance was 59.82 and 66.45 for khat chewers and non-chewers, respectively. The findings showed that the chance of having an excellent academic performance was 35% lower for female students [AOR=0.65:95%CI: -0.819-0.055] and 45% lower for those unsatisfied with their school environment [AOR: 0.55, 95% CI: -1.014-0.173]. The chance of having an excellent academic performance was 6.43 times higher for those whose fathers had an educational grade of 7-12 [AOR: 6.43, 95%CI: 1.098-2.624] and 6.59 times higher for those with fathers who had a diploma [AOR: 6.59, 95% CI: 1.026-2.745], 8.01 times higher for those with a family income of 2001-5000ETB [AOR=8.01:95% CI: 1.479-2.683], 2.07 times higher for those with no alcohol use disorder [AOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.21-2.93], and 6.84 times higher for those with no depressive disorders [AOR: 6.84, 95% CI: 1.056-2.791]. Conclusions: Academic performance was lower among khat chewers than among non-khat chewers, and was affected by factors such as family income, father's educational status, classroom environment, depression, anxiety, and alcohol use disorder. Enhancing school-community relations and increasing awareness can enhance academic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.