ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Lower adenoma detection rate in anesthesia assisted colonoscopy: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Limited Diagnostic Yield of Routine Gastroscopy in FIT-Positive Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: As anesthesia assisted (AA) colonoscopy becomes increasingly popular, there has been concern about its impact on the quality of colonoscopy examinations. We aimed to clarify the impact of anesthesia assistance on the adenoma detection rate (ADR) and non-adenomatous polyp detection rate (PDR) of colonoscopy. Methods: We collected data from patients undergoing colonoscopy throughout the year 2023 at our institution, with a total of 16,465 cases identified for potential analysis. After using propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize the influence of other variables on the study outcomes, there were 6,094 cases remaining for analysis in both the AA group and non-AA group, respectively. Then, we compared the ADR and PDR between the two groups and analyzed the colon location and size of adenomas or polyps found in different groups. Results: The ADR in the non-AA group (36.94%) was significantly higher than that in the AA group (26.40%) (p<0.0001), while there was no statistically significant difference in the PDR between the two groups. AA could also affect the probability of discovering adenomas or polyps in some colon segments, but had no significant effect on the size of the discovered adenomas or polyps. In addition, there were more significant advantages of ADR in the non-AA group among the more experienced endoscopists' cohort. Conclusions: Non-AA colonoscopy had a higher ADR, suggesting that while AA may potentially reduce patient stress responses to some extent, it confers few benefits in terms of adenoma detection. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=232248.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.