Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276057›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

The practical roadmap for peri-cystectomy approaches in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Joseph Kattan, Clarisse Kattan, Fouad Aoun, Elie Nemr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph KattanDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Hotel-Dieu de France University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Clarisse KattanDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Hotel-Dieu de France University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Fouad AounDepartment of Urology, Hotel-Dieu de France University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Elie NemrDepartment of Urology, Hotel-Dieu de France University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) remains a challenging topic since it is witnessing rapidly evolving changes and new drug approvals. In fact, more effective approaches are now available to improve the outcomes of patients with MIBC who are candidates for cystectomy. Neo-adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy was the standard approach for patients who were deemed cisplatin-eligible. Also, adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy was considered for high-risk operated patients who did not receive the standard neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. It was only recently that adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors were proved effective in adjuvant settings and were approved for high-risk MIBC patients after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by cystectomy or for those who did not receive neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and were not eligible for adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. More recently, adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and to post-cystectomy adjuvant therapy seemed to be very promising. In this review article, all current peri-cystectomy options are briefly described with an attempt to guide and simplify choices by drawing a roadmap covering all the practical scenarios.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemotherapyadjuvant immunotherapymuscle invasive bladder cancerneo-adjuvant chemoimmunotherapyneo-adjuvant chemotherapyperi-cystectomy therapy

Identifiers

PMID40276057
PMCPMC12018224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.