Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40276039›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025

Identifying similar populations across independent single cell studies without data integration.

Oscar González-Velasco, Malte Simon, Rüstem Yilmaz, Rosanna Parlato, Jochen Weishaupt, Charles D Imbusch, Benedikt Brors

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oscar González-VelascoDivision Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5054-8635
Malte SimonDivision Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Rüstem YilmazDivision of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Rosanna ParlatoDivision of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Jochen WeishauptDivision of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim Center for Translational Neurosciences, Heidelberg University, 68167 Mannheim, Germany.
Charles D ImbuschDivision Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Benedikt BrorsDivision Applied Bioinformatics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5940-3101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supervised and unsupervised methods have emerged to address the complexity of single cell data analysis in the context of large pools of independent studies. Here, we present ClusterFoldSimilarity (CFS), a novel statistical method design to quantify the similarity between cell groups across any number of independent datasets, without the need for data correction or integration. By bypassing these processes, CFS avoids the introduction of artifacts and loss of information, offering a simple, efficient, and scalable solution. This method match groups of cells that exhibit conserved phenotypes across datasets, including different tissues and species, and in a multimodal scenario, including single-cell RNA-Seq, ATAC-Seq, single-cell proteomics, or, more broadly, data exhibiting differential abundance effects among groups of cells. Additionally, CFS performs feature selection, obtaining cross-dataset markers of the similar phenotypes observed, providing an inherent interpretability of relationships between cell populations. To showcase the effectiveness of our methodology, we generated single-nuclei RNA-Seq data from the motor cortex and spinal cord of adult mice. By using CFS, we identified three distinct sub-populations of astrocytes conserved on both tissues. CFS includes various visualization methods for the interpretation of the similarity scores and similar cell populations.

Indexed as

Single-Cell AnalysisAnimalsAstrocytesCluster AnalysisMiceMotor CortexRNA-SeqSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID40276039
PMCPMC12019640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.