ReviewJAC-antimicrobial resistance2025
Mitigating inequitable access to appropriate antibiotics in low- and middle-income countries.
Review in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Antibiotics Use Patterns in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingPooled it
- Antibiotic therapy for pelvic inflammatory disease: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial peptides as sustainable alternatives to antibiotics in livestock production: implications for animal health in tropical and sub-tropical systems.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Review
- Antibiotic Resistance and the Return to a Pre-Antibiotic Era: A Critical Narrative Review of a Global Catastrophe.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- A Codesigned Approach to Develop Tailored Antimicrobial Stewardship Strategies in Bangladesh: A Social-Ecological Systems Framework Analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance at the Human-Animal-Environment Interface: A One Health Perspective on Drivers, Transmission, and Public Health Responses.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Stewardship, Laboratory Surveillance, and Quality Management in Africa: A Narrative Review of Challenges and Opportunities for Integrated AMR Control.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Antigonococcal Activity and Cytotoxicity Screening of Three Ziziphus Species Indigenous to South Africa.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- How Health Policies Shape Antibiotic Use: A Nationwide Study of "Access"-Group Antibiotics Availability and Consumption in a Middle-Income Country: The Case of Kazakhstan.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Linking access to stewardship: a pathway for introducing reserve antibiotics in India.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- Genomic architecture of fourth-generation cephalosporin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Species Complex (KpSC) from patients and their hospital environment in Uganda.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- WASH-nutrition integration as a global policy priority for antimicrobial stewardship in low- and middle-income countries.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Economic Barriers to Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing as a Structural Contributor to Antimicrobial Resistance in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Community engagement strategies for antimicrobial resistance control and interventions.BMJ public health · 2026Review
- No access, no cure: the global crisis of treating extensively drug-resistant carbapenemase-producing organisms.Future microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to effective medicines (e.g. antibiotics) is a fundamental human right. However, in contrast to high-income countries (HICs), many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) lack appropriate and effective antibiotics. This is a paradox, and an inequitable scenario, as LMICs can have significantly higher burdens of infectious diseases than HICs and especially require appropriate antibiotics. Inequitable access to appropriate antibiotics results in patients being treated with substandard antibiotics, treatment failure, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and, inevitably, morbidity and mortality. Factors that hinder access to appropriate antibiotics in LMICs include: poor political will, weak health systems, complex bureaucratic protocols, poor implementation of National Action Plans on AMR, inadequate expertise in regulatory science, unfavourable macroeconomic policies and a poor investment climate. Clearly, multisectoral, collaborative approaches are required to effectively mitigate inequitable access to appropriate antibiotics in LMICs. Also, efforts (such as the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization Initiative and the African Medicines Agency) to streamline bureaucratic processes and improve the registration and entry of appropriate antibiotics into LMICs are required. This review discusses factors responsible for inequitable access to appropriate antibiotics in LMICs, and makes recommendations to mitigate the problem. With rising rates of AMR, a dwindling antibiotic pipeline, and the dangers of a post-antibiotic era, it is clear that the time to act is now, as inequitable access to appropriate antibiotics in LMICs reduces the quality of healthcare, and threatens the achievement of Universal Health Coverage and, ultimately, the Sustainable Development Goals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.