ArticleInternational journal of transgender health2025
Feasibility and acceptability of collecting biobehavioral data from Latinx transgender and nonbinary people.
Article in International journal of transgender health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Latinx transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) people are at high risk of poor health compared to cisgender (i.e., non-TGNB) people. Most studies about the health of Latinx TGNB people have collected self-reported data. There is an urgent need for inclusion of biobehavioral measures to better understand and target the underlying mechanisms of health disparities among Latinx TGNB people. We conducted the first study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of collecting biobehavioral data that we are aware of in this population. Methods: Participants were recruited from an existing longitudinal study of TGNB individuals and through outreach to the community. Data collection involved structured surveys, saliva samples, actigraphy, sleep dairies, and blood pressure monitoring. We administered a survey with Likert scale items and open-ended questions to assess the acceptability of our study procedures. Results: The sample consisted of 41 Latinx TGNB adults with a mean age of 35.7 (+/- 11.9) years. The majority of participants completed all phases of data collection, demonstrating feasibility of study procedures. Acceptability was overall good, but there were a few exceptions; some participants disliked ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or saliva collection. The open-ended responses on the acceptability survey organized around each aspect of the data collection procedures, and the following additional categories were derived: 1) perceived benefits of participating in research, 2) interest in receiving individual data, and 3) the importance of TGNB cultural awareness for study staff. Conclusions: This study is one of the first to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of collecting biobehavioral data with Latinx TGNB people. Biobehavioral research can help to illuminate mechanisms underlying the substantial health disparities experienced by this multiply minoritized group. Future research with this population should consider augmenting self-reported data by including biobehavioral measures relevant for the research question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.