Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275983›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Dataset creation of thermal images of pomegranate for internal defect detection.

Ashvini Gaikwad, Manoj Deshpande, Varsha Bhole

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashvini GaikwadA. C. Patil College of Engineering Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Manoj DeshpandeA. C. Patil College of Engineering Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Varsha BholeA. C. Patil College of Engineering Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Datasets are crucial in various fields, especially in the context of machine learning, data science and research. Datasets are used to train machine learning models. A model learns patterns and relationships from the data it is exposed to. The dataset used for training a machine learning model shall be diversified and consist sufficient samples of desired categories. This paper presents various steps and its outcome in preparing the dataset of digital and thermal images of pomegranate for recognising internal defects. The defects in fruits are often categorised as surface defects and internal defects. The surface defects are recognised with digital RGB image but fails to give insight about the internal structure of the fruit in which we are often interested. The thermal images can be used to detect the internal defects in fruits. When a fruit is subjected to temperature difference as compared to the surrounding, the thermal emissions from fruit captured through a thermal camera (thermal image) gives the key information about the internal damages in the fruit. The internal defects are reflected in thermal image as variations in temperature of adjacent pixels. The k-mean segmentation is applied for identifying internal defects with thermal images in pomegranates to categorize them viz. No defect, major defect and minor defect. This information is useful for training a machine learning algorithms that are intended for bulk processing in the field of fruit defect detection and classification.

Indexed as

Defect detectionK-mean segmentationPomegranate datasetThermal imaging

Identifiers

PMID40275983
PMCPMC12020839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.