ArticleData in brief2025
EMG features dataset for arm activity recognition.
Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic Evaluation of sEMG Processing Pipelines for Gesture Recognition.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a dataset on hand gesture recognition using electromyography (EMG) signals. The data was collected from eight healthy subjects aged between 19 and 35 years, with each subject performing three distinct hand gestures (lifting, grabbing, and flexing). Surface EMG signals were recorded using the Delsys Trigno Wireless biofeedback system from four sensors placed on the dominant hand's Palm A, Palm B, Biceps, and Forearm. The signals were sampled at 2000 Hz and segmented into gesture trials for analysis. The raw EMG data were filtered and processed to extract seven time-domain features across each channel, resulting in 28 total features. These features were reduced using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to six components, which accounted for 95 % of the variance. The dataset was then used to train and test machine learning models (Random Forest and Logistic Regression) for gesture classification. This dataset has potential reuse in developing gesture recognition algorithms, enhancing prosthetic control, or exploring human-computer interaction (HCI) applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.