ReviewIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
Challenges of Intraoperative Documentation and Its Role in Patient Safety: An Integrative Review.
Review in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The low data fidelity of human-based informatics in surgical instrument waste reduction: is it time for objective computer vision integration?BMC health services research · 2026Observational
- Incidence and risk factors for nursing-related intraoperative incidents: A 5-year retrospective study at a Japanese tertiary care hospital.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2025Observational
- Elevating surgical outcomes: a comprehensive analysis of innovative nursing practices in intraoperative care across diverse specialties.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate and complete intraoperative documentation is crucial for maintaining consistency in patient care, facilitating handoffs between surgical teams, and evaluating outcomes. This integrative review aimed to investigate the challenges of intraoperative documentation and its role in patient safety. Materials and Methods: A search of English-language databases including EMBASE, Proquest, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus was conducted from 2001 to 2022 using the keywords "intraoperative documentation", "patient safety", "documentation", and "intraoperative". Results: Nineteen articles were included from the initial 86 identified studies. Key findings were that protocols, safe surgical plans, accurate documentation, error/complication prevention measures, teamwork, safety culture, checklists, and instrument/sponge counts positively impact patient safety. Conclusions: Operating rooms require precise patient information and documentation pre-, intra- and post-operatively. This review indicates intraoperative documentation can improve surgical team performance and patient safety by facilitating continuity of care, handoffs, and outcomes assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.