Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275930›Full record

ReviewIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research

Challenges of Intraoperative Documentation and Its Role in Patient Safety: An Integrative Review.

Leila Akbari, Akram Aarabi, Masoud Bahrami

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leila AkbariNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Akram AarabiNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Masoud BahramiNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate and complete intraoperative documentation is crucial for maintaining consistency in patient care, facilitating handoffs between surgical teams, and evaluating outcomes. This integrative review aimed to investigate the challenges of intraoperative documentation and its role in patient safety. Materials and Methods: A search of English-language databases including EMBASE, Proquest, Web of Science, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus was conducted from 2001 to 2022 using the keywords "intraoperative documentation", "patient safety", "documentation", and "intraoperative". Results: Nineteen articles were included from the initial 86 identified studies. Key findings were that protocols, safe surgical plans, accurate documentation, error/complication prevention measures, teamwork, safety culture, checklists, and instrument/sponge counts positively impact patient safety. Conclusions: Operating rooms require precise patient information and documentation pre-, intra- and post-operatively. This review indicates intraoperative documentation can improve surgical team performance and patient safety by facilitating continuity of care, handoffs, and outcomes assessment.

Indexed as

Documentationintegrative reviewintraoperativemedical recordoperating roompatient safetysafety culture

Identifiers

PMID40275930
PMCPMC12017641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.