ReviewIranian journal of nursing and midwifery research
Consequences of Moral Outrage among Nurses: A Scoping Review.
Review in Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical nurses often encounter situations that challenge their professional integrity and values. In the face of these issues, many nurses have been subjected to moral outrage (MO) in response to moral violations by others, which can have different outcomes. This scoping review aimed to synthesize and summarize findings from existing articles regarding the consequences of moral outrage among nurses. Materials and Methods: This paper presents a scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. PubMed, Springer, Scopus, and ScienceDirect databases were systematically searched using the keywords "moral outrage", "nurses or nursing" and "consequences or outcomes or impacts or effects or influences of moral outrage" (viz., moral OR ethical AND outrage AND nurse*). The PRISMA checklist was used for the scoping review to evaluate articles thoroughly. The results were summarized using the inductive content analysis suggested by Elo and Kyngäs. Results: In total, 1014 articles were identified as potentially relevant to this study with 34 articles synthesized, including 24 qualitative studies, 5 quantitative studies, and 5 reviews focused on the consequences of moral offenses in nursing. Negative consequences such as mental exhaustion, job burnout, and interpersonal failures were observed, alongside positive consequences like nurses' altruism, callousness, and professional solidarity. Conclusions: These findings underscore the importance of addressing MO among nurses to prevent negative consequences such as burnout and moral degradation. Moreover, recognizing and fostering the altruistic and resilient aspects of nurses in response to moral outrage can lead to a more positive work environment and improved patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.