ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Docking Methods for Robot-assisted Rhytidectomy and Platysmaplasty.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the development of robotic surgery has been rapidly evolving as well as the interest in their use due to the advantages they provide, such as precision in dissection, the ability to magnify the visualization of the operative field up to 20:1, and the ability to operate in hard-to-reach areas that otherwise cannot be achieved using the traditional methods. Research is being published constantly on the utilization of such robots within the fields of general surgery, oncology, and urology, with few cases in maxillofacial surgery. Methods: There are no docking algorithms or methods for plastic surgery operations, especially those involving the head and neck area. In this article, we explore different docking methods with da Vinci Si, Xi, and 5 surgical systems for aesthetic facial and neck surgery. Results: The results of the multiple different techniques used highlighted a few possible access points, whereas others were deemed impractical due to certain limitations such as the limited maneuverability of the robot's arms, the angles required for safe access, and the patient's body limiting the movement of the robot. Da Vinci 5 comes with significant advantages compared with its predecessors due to its novel and improved technologies, such as force feedback technology and artificial intelligence greatly enhancing the robot's usability. Conclusions: Robotic surgery is a viable operative method that is beneficial for improving the outcomes when using the appropriate docking methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.