ArticleBMJ public health2025
Does the reduction in obstetric hospitals result in an unintended decreased in-hospital delivery utilisation? A causal multilevel analysis in China.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: China's progress towards achieving Sustainable Development Goals for maternal health is largely attributed to a reduction in maternal mortality rates, driven by increased in-hospital delivery services utilisation. However, recent reductions in the number of obstetric hospitals have raised concerns about compromised access to these services. This study investigates the impact of reduced obstetric hospitals on spatial accessibility and the utilisation of in-hospital delivery services. Methods: Data from 2016 to 2020 were collected from a densely populated province with approximately 83 million residents. Directed Acyclic Graph was applied to identify a minimally sufficient set of confounders, including residential characteristics and transportation-related factors. Multilevel regression models were employed to analyse the causal effects, with sensitivity analysis using fixed effect and quantile regression models. Results: Between 2017 and 2020, the number of obstetric hospitals decreased by 21.3% (from 1209 to 951), leading to a decline in the proportion of pregnant women covered within a 2-hour driving radius (from 97.4% to 97.1%) and an increase in the maximum of shortest driving time within county (from 117.2 to 121.0 min). Multilevel regression models, adjusted for confounders, showed that a 1 percentage point increase in the proportion of pregnant women covered within a 2-hour driving radius was associated with a 13 percentage point (95% CI: 11.4 to 14.7) increase in in-hospital delivery rates, especially in areas with lower coverage and in-hospital delivery rates. Conclusions: The reduction in obstetric hospitals increased travel distances, negatively impacting in-hospital delivery utilisation. Expanding the proportion of pregnant women covered within a 2-hour driving radius may be more effective than reducing the maximum of shortest travel distance within a county when optimising obstetric hospital locations. These findings provide insights for optimising obstetric facility locations in similar low- and middle-income countries. While improving spatial accessibility is important, the potential quality gains from centralising obstetric resources should also be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.