ReviewClinics in shoulder and elbow2025
Timing of surgery for terrible triad of the shoulder: a systematic review.
Review in Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The terrible triad of the shoulder (STT) is an injury involving anterior shoulder dislocation, rotator cuff tear, and nerve injury. The optimal timing for rotator cuff repair (RCR) remains controversial, with some favoring early intervention and others recommending delaying surgery until nerve recovery. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, exploring STT treatment and RCR timing using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria were studies published in English and involving human subjects. Exclusion criteria included non-English articles, review papers, cadaveric studies, and studies on unrelated conditions. Time to surgery and outcomes related to shoulder and nerve function, such as range of motion, muscle strength, and sensation were analyzed qualitatively. Of 671 articles identified, 28 met inclusion criteria. Most patients underwent surgical RCR and demonstrated excellent functional and neurologic outcomes, with many achieving 150°+ flexion, 110°+ abduction, 4+/5 strength, and resolution of nerve hypoesthesia. RCR timing ranged from 10 days to 6 months, with comparable outcomes regardless of timing. Prompt RCR in STT may be beneficial for maximizing shoulder outcomes, while coexisting nerve injuries should be managed conservatively with watchful waiting, as most recover spontaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.