Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40275782›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of developmental psychology2025

Recognizing the future utility of a solution: When do children choose to retain and share an object to solve a future problem?

Zoe Ockerby, Jonathan Redshaw, Thomas Suddendorf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of developmental psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zoe OckerbySchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8883-0719
Jonathan RedshawSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Thomas SuddendorfSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans' ability to recognize the future utility of a solution is fundamental to our capacity for innovation. It motivates us to-for instance-retain and share useful tools, transforming one-time solutions into innovations that change the future. However, developmental research on innovation has thus far primarily focused on children's capacity to create solutions, rather than recognition of their future utility. Here we examined children's tendency to retain and share a solution that would be useful again at a later point. Across two rooms, 4- to 9-year-olds (N = 83, M = 83.59 months, SD = 21.21 months, 43 girls) were given a series of time-limited tasks which could be solved by building and using a tool. When given the opportunity to transport a tool between the first and second rooms, children from age 6 onwards took the tool that would be useful again above chance levels. When subsequently asked to secure a solution for another child, only 8- to 9-year-olds chose this tool above chance. Positive age-partialled correlations between children's retaining and sharing suggest that these behaviours may reflect a common underlying capacity for recognizing future utility.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentChoice BehaviorProblem SolvingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalecognitive developmentforesightfuture utilityinnovationtool retainingtool sharing

Identifiers

PMID40275782
PMCPMC12505840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.